rtpslotsguide

Reload bonuses at British-licensed casinos: what the 2026 rules leave on the table

A reload bonus is the offer that turns up after the welcome package has been used up. Same shape as a sign-up deal — a percentage match on a deposit, free spins bolted on the side — but aimed at a player who already has an account, a history, and a routine. The mechanics haven’t changed. What has changed is what the Gambling Commission now lets the offer do. Since 19 December 2025, wagering requirements on any casino bonus are capped at 10x, and mixed-product deals (a sports bet that unlocks casino spins, or vice versa) are no longer permitted. For reloads specifically, the effect is direct: the worst terms the market used to carry are gone, and the gap between a good offer and a poor one has narrowed to the point where the size and the time-cost of clearing it decide everything else.

A hand tapping a redeposit button on a mobile banking app next to a plain home screen.
On 18 September 2026 the Gambling Commission’s public register listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence.

Current as of 8 November 2026, verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses.

The Gambling Commission frame around every reload offer

A reload bonus is still a gambling promotion under the Gambling Act 2005. That places it inside the same Commission rules that govern welcome offers, free spin bundles, and loyalty perks: licensed operators only, GAMSTOP participation mandatory, identity and age verified before the first deposit, and — since 14 April 2020 — no funding from credit cards, including credit cards loaded into an e-wallet.

A calendar with a returning-player deposit date circled beside a calculator showing a percentage match.
The Gambling Commission’s domain register held 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries as of 18 September 2026.

The register is the only test that matters. On 18 September 2026 the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence. Each licence carries an account number in the form shown on the register, and any online casino licence number has the structure account-R-number-suffix, with the leading six digits matching the licence holder’s account and the R marking the remote (online) variant. Anyone taking custom in Great Britain on a casino product needs a Commission licence, no matter where the operator itself is seated — a Curaçao or Malta number is not a substitute. Three of the brands in the set that follows (Ladbrokes, Coral and Gala Bingo) all sit under a single licensee, LC International Limited, and use the same remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. The site a player lands on is the variable, not the licence behind it.

The same register carries the domain list — every website an account operates, marked Active, Inactive or White Label. A white-label site trades under another company’s licence. The register held 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries on the same date. White-label pages do not get a separate licence; they inherit the licence of the holder they trade under, and the protections that come with it. A player on a white-label site is still inside the Commission’s frame, still in GAMSTOP, and still inside the bonus cap.

Incentives: the structure of a reload, and what 10x does to it

A reload offer is, structurally, three things layered on top of each other: a deposit match, a free-spin bundle, and a wagering requirement. Each piece has its own ceiling, and the Commission’s 19 December 2025 rules reset those ceilings in a way that changes how a player reads the headline number.

A magnifying glass over a printed terms-and-conditions page on a desk.
bet365’s domain is listed on the Gambling Commission register under operating licence 055149-R-331499-004.

The deposit match is the percentage of the player’s deposit that the casino returns as bonus funds — 50% on a £40 top-up returns £20 of bonus, 100% on £40 returns £40, and so on. Free spins sit alongside: a fixed number of rounds on a named slot at a fixed stake, paid out as bonus funds until the wagering requirement is met. The wagering requirement is the multiplier that has to be applied to the bonus amount before any of it becomes withdrawable cash. At a 10x cap, a £20 bonus means £200 of qualifying bets before the bonus money itself is unlocked — and once it’s unlocked, it stays unlocked; the rule caps the multiplier, not the time it takes to clear.

The pre-cap market ran wagering at 35x, 40x, sometimes higher. The cap flattens that to a uniform ceiling, which makes the size of the bonus and the speed at which it can be turned over the only variables that matter. A small bonus with a short turnover is now genuinely a small bonus. A large bonus is a large time-cost — and that is where the calculus has shifted.

What 10x turnover actually costs in time

The bonus amount multiplied by the wagering factor gives the required turnover. Divide that by the stake per spin, and the result is the number of spins. Each spin takes a minimum of 2.5 seconds under the auto-play ban that has been in force since 31 October 2021, so spins multiplied by 2.5 seconds gives the floor on the time-cost of clearing the bonus — call it roughly five seconds per spin once a player has clicked through to the next round and acknowledged the reality check.

A £20 bonus at 10x means £200 of turnover. At a £1 stake per spin, that is 200 spins. At 5 seconds per spin, that is roughly 17 minutes of actual play. A £100 bonus at 10x means £1,000 of turnover; at the same stake, 1,000 spins, or about 84 minutes. The slot’s return-to-player percentage decides how much of that £200 or £1,000 is expected to come back, and the difference between what comes back and what was staked is the bonus’s real cost. None of this is a guarantee for any one session — it is a statistical estimate, averaged across many spins under the stated assumptions.

The arithmetic belongs to the player. The rule belongs to the Commission. The point is that a reload offer at a GB-licensed casino is now, structurally, a small wager of time against a small amount of bonus money. The marketing claim of “huge reload” does not survive the 10x cap and a £5 maximum stake per game cycle.

Bonus Size Turnover Requirement Time-Cost Estimate
Small 10x ~17 minutes
Medium 10x ~40-90 minutes
Large 10x ~84+ minutes

Bonuses and free spins: where repeat-deposit value actually sits

Reload bonuses are a separate shelf from welcome offers for a reason: the welcome package is a one-time acquisition tool, and the reload is a retention tool. The terms are usually softer — lower percentage match, smaller spin bundles, shorter validity windows — because the operator already has the customer and is competing against other retention offers, not against the absence of a deal.

For a player, the comparison is not between reloads and the welcome package they already used. It is between the reloads on offer this week at this brand and the reloads at the next brand over. After the 10x cap, the comparison reduces to three numbers: how big the match is, how many spins are bolted on, and how long the bonus is valid. A 50% match with 20 spins at 10x and a 7-day validity is one offer. A 25% match with 50 spins at 10x and a 30-day validity is a different offer for a different player. Both are inside the cap.

The free-spin piece matters more than the match percentage for players with a small bankroll. Free spins are a fixed-cost route through the wagering requirement — the spin count and stake are set, and the only variable is the slot’s return-to-player. A match bonus at 50% requires the player to deposit twice as much as the bonus is worth to unlock it, which is a real-money commitment before any bonus funds exist. Free spins do not.

The trade-off is time. A match bonus with a long validity window gives a player space to clear it slowly, in sessions that do not strain the bankroll. A short validity window — 24 or 48 hours — compresses the wagering requirement into a single sitting, which concentrates the cost. The terms page is where this lives; the headline does not.

Payments and the practical side of claiming a reload

The minimum deposit to trigger a reload is set by the offer, not by the operator’s wider payment policy. A reload offer might require £10 to unlock, or £20, or £50, depending on the percentage match and the target customer. The deposit must clear before the bonus funds are credited, and the wagering requirement starts the moment the bonus is in the account.

Funding the deposit means a debit card, a bank transfer, or an e-wallet that has not been topped up by credit card since 14 April 2020. Bank transfers inside the UK typically move through the Faster Payments Service, which has run since 2008 and which most banks settle in seconds or minutes, though transfers can occasionally take up to two hours, and individual banks impose their own per-transaction limits beneath the £1,000,000 scheme ceiling. Apple Pay works as a debit-card front end, tokenising the card number into a device-specific token at the point of payment, so a reload deposit through Apple Pay is, behind the scenes, a debit-card deposit. AstroPay, where it is supported, runs as an electronic money institution in the UK — its UK entity, Larstal Limited, holds FCA authorisation under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 — and the same credit-card rule applies: the wallet cannot have been loaded from credit. A reload deposit clears or it does not, and a deposit that does not clear is not eligible for the bonus.

Withdrawals of bonus winnings are not the same as withdrawals of cash deposits. Once the wagering requirement is met, the bonus funds convert to withdrawable cash — and from that point, the standard withdrawal route applies: debit card, bank transfer, or the same e-wallet used to deposit, subject to the operator’s own processing times and any verification checks. Until the requirement is met, the bonus balance is not withdrawable, regardless of how long the player has held the account.

Responsible gaming and what a reload specifically does to it

A reload offer is, by design, a prompt to deposit. The mechanism is the same as a welcome bonus — funds in, bonus credited, wagering required — but the trigger is a player who already has an account, a routine, and a habit. The Commission treats this with the same safeguards as any other gambling promotion: identity and age verified before the first deposit, GAMSTOP enrolment mandatory, financial vulnerability checks triggered at £150 net deposits in a rolling 30-day window since 28 February 2025, and a mandatory prompt to set a financial limit before the first deposit since 31 October 2025.

A reload specifically concentrates risk on returning players. The safeguard that meets it is the same set of tools that applies to any deposit: deposit limits, reality checks, time-outs, and self-exclusion via GAMSTOP for six months, one year, or five years, none of which can be reversed early. The National Gambling Helpline, run by GamCare, and GambleAware sit behind those tools.

The honest read is that a reload bonus is a tool for spending, not a tool for saving money, and the longer a player has held an account the more frictionless claiming one becomes. A reload bonus that arrives in a notification, with a one-click opt-in, is a frictionless deposit prompt. A reload bonus that requires the player to opt in each time, with the wagering terms re-stated, is a smaller prompt. The mechanic is the operator’s; the boundary is the player’s.

What the 2026 reload landscape looks like in practice

Ten GB-licensed operators make up the comparison set below. Each is taken from the Gambling Commission’s public register, with the licence account and the remote casino operating licence number verified against the register on 18 September 2026. The order is the order in which they appear on the register’s licence account numbering, not a recommendation. Three of the ten — Ladbrokes, Coral and Gala Bingo — operate under a single licence held by LC International Limited, which means they share a regulatory frame but offer different product mixes and different reload terms.

Brand Licence holder and remote casino licence Domain status on the register Reload-bonus support
Paddy Power PPB Games Limited · 039411-R-319335-010 Active —
Ladbrokes LC International Limited · 054743-R-330863-014 Active —
MrQ Tek Fox Ltd · 060629-R-337532-004 Active —
Coral LC International Limited · 054743-R-330863-014 Active —
bet365 Hillside (UK Gaming) ENC · 055149-R-331499-004 Active —
Betfred Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited · 039544-R-319290-010 Active —
Casumo Recro Limited · 061549-R-336718-002 Active —
888casino 888 UK Limited · 039028-R-319297-014 Active —
Jackpotjoy Gamesys Operations Limited · 038905-R-319430-022 Active —
Gala Bingo LC International Limited · 054743-R-330863-014 Active —

The em-dash in the right-hand column is the honest answer: the register records the licence, the domain, and the licensee, and nothing else. It does not record the size of a reload match, the number of free spins on offer, or the validity window of the bonus. Those live on each operator’s own promotions page, behind a login, and they change weekly. The register is what tells a player the brand is licensed; the terms page is what tells them what the reload is worth.

Paddy Power — broad market brand, shared LC International adjacency

Paddy Power sits on the register under PPB Games Limited, account 39411, with the remote casino operating licence 039411-R-319335-010 and the domain Paddy Power listed as active. It is a multi-product brand — sportsbook, casino, bingo — and its reload offers tend to mirror that breadth, with separate casino, bingo and sports reloads running in parallel rather than a single unified promotion.

For a player, the implication is breadth over depth. A Paddy Power reload is one of several on the same account, and the choice of which to claim depends on which product the player uses. The £5 maximum stake per game cycle and the 10x wagering cap apply across the board, so the comparison against any other GB-licensed brand is a comparison of size and timing, not of regulatory ceiling.

Ladbrokes — large licence account, multi-brand family

Ladbrokes runs under LC International Limited, account 54743, with the remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. The same licence covers Coral and Gala Bingo, which means the three brands share a compliance and payments backbone, even though they run distinct front ends. The reload calendar tends to be aligned across the three, with the same weekly slots landing on the same days.

The trade-off is product familiarity against product variation. A player who wants one account and three product mixes gets that here. A player who wants a reload offer specific to one vertical — casino-only, bingo-only — gets that across the family rather than within it.

MrQ — smaller operator, simpler bonus structure

MrQ sits under Tek Fox Ltd, account 60629, with the remote casino operating licence 060629-R-337532-004. MrQ’s wider market position is that of a smaller, slots-led brand without the sportsbook or bingo bundle that the larger accounts carry. The reload calendar tends to be thinner and the terms simpler.

For a player who wants a slots-only reload without the cross-product terms that come with multi-product brands, MrQ is a closer fit. The 10x cap and the £5 maximum stake still apply; the difference is in what else sits on the same account.

Coral — LC International sibling, sportsbook-led

Coral shares the LC International Limited licence with Ladbrokes and Gala Bingo — same account 54743, same remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. Coral’s product mix is sportsbook-heavy, with a casino product running in parallel. The reload calendar follows the family pattern: weekly offers, same-day alignment across the LC International brands.

A player on Coral is, in regulatory terms, a player on the same licence as a player on Ladbrokes or Gala Bingo. The brand-level differences are product mix, promotions page, and customer account — the underlying protections and the bonus cap are identical.

bet365 — the licence register’s clearest single-brand account

bet365 sits under Hillside (UK Gaming) ENC, account 55149, with the remote casino operating licence 055149-R-331499-004 — the licence number’s leading six digits repeat the account number, which is the register’s standard format. bet365 is listed as an active domain. It is the largest single-brand casino-and-sportsbook account in the comparison set and runs the most extensive reload calendar.

The reload calendar at bet365 is dense — multiple concurrent offers on casino, sports, and games, with the reload promotion cycling daily in some slots and weekly in others. The trade-off is volume: a player has to navigate the offers to find the one that fits their play rather than accepting the default.

Betfred — sportsbook-led, retail-rooted

Betfred sits under Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited, account 39544, with the remote casino operating licence 039544-R-319290-010 and Betfred is listed as an active domain. Petfre is Gibraltar-based, but the Commission licence is what counts for taking custom in Great Britain — the seat of the licensee is not a substitute for the licence. Betfred’s reload calendar runs on a similar weekly cadence to its peers, with sportsbook reloads dominant and casino reloads running alongside.

Casumo — single-product, slots-led

Casumo sits under Recro Limited, account 61549, with the remote casino operating licence 061549-R-336718-002. Casumo is a slots-and-live-casino brand without the sportsbook layer. The reload structure tends toward casino-specific offers with a simpler terms page than the multi-product brands.

For a player whose play is slots-only, Casumo’s reload calendar is a closer fit than a multi-product brand’s, because the offers are aimed at the same audience without the cross-product terms that come with sportsbook or bingo lines.

888casino — long-standing casino-only licence account

888casino sits under 888 UK Limited, account 39028, with the remote casino operating licence 039028-R-319297-014 — one of the older licence numbers on the register, reflecting 888’s tenure as a casino-only brand. The reload calendar runs on a casino-specific cadence, with offers aimed at slots and live casino players rather than a sportsbook audience.

Jackpotjoy — bingo-rooted, casino secondary

Jackpotjoy sits under Gamesys Operations Limited, account 38905, with the remote casino operating licence 038905-R-319430-022. The brand’s heritage is bingo, with a casino product running alongside. The reload calendar reflects that: bingo reloads lead, with casino reloads in support. A player whose primary product is casino will find the calendar thinner than at a casino-led brand; a player whose primary product is bingo will find it well-fitted.

Gala Bingo — third LC International brand

Gala Bingo shares the LC International Limited licence with Ladbrokes and Coral — same account 54743, same remote casino operating licence 054743-R-330863-014. It is the bingo-led brand in the family, with a casino product running alongside. The reload calendar follows the family pattern.

Wagering turnover at the new cap: what a player is committing to

A reload bonus is a wager of time. The bonus amount multiplied by 10x gives the turnover the player has to put through the qualifying games. That turnover divided by the stake per spin gives the spin count, and the spin count multiplied by 5 seconds per spin gives the time-cost floor.

A £20 reload bonus means £200 of turnover. At a £1 stake per spin, that is 200 spins, or roughly 17 minutes of play. A £50 bonus means £500 of turnover, 500 spins, and around 42 minutes. A £100 bonus means £1,000 of turnover, 1,000 spins, and roughly 84 minutes. The slot’s return-to-player percentage sets how much of that turnover comes back, and the gap between what is staked and what comes back is the bonus’s real cost — the rest of the offer is the part the player actually keeps.

The arithmetic is a statistical estimate averaged over many spins. It is not a promise for any single session. The player who takes 200 spins at £1 each on a 96% return-to-player slot will, on average, get £192 back from £200 staked, and the £8 difference is the expected cost of clearing the bonus. Some sessions will return more, some less; the average is the only number that survives across many sessions.

Turnover at a glance

A small reload bonus clears in under 20 minutes. A medium one clears in 40 to 90 minutes. A large one runs into hours. The size of the bonus is the variable; the 10x multiplier is fixed; the slot’s return-to-player is fixed once the offer is claimed. The player who chooses a smaller bonus is buying a smaller time-cost, and the bonus’s headline number is the only thing that scales.

The point is that a reload offer’s marketing language does not survive the cap and the stake ceiling. A “huge reload” at 10x and a £5 maximum stake is, in practice, a fixed time-cost against a fixed bonus amount, and the comparison between brands reduces to which one offers the better trade-off between size and time.

Choosing a reload offer: what actually changes the comparison

Three things move the comparison between reload offers at GB-licensed casinos in 2026: the size of the bonus, the spin count, and the validity window. Everything else — the wagering multiplier, the maximum stake, the eligible games — is fixed by the Commission’s rules and does not vary between brands.

A player with a small bankroll is better served by a smaller bonus with a longer validity window. The smaller bonus costs less in expected loss, and the longer validity window spreads the time-cost across sessions that do not strain the bankroll. A player with a larger bankroll and a longer time horizon is better served by a larger bonus with a shorter validity, because the expected loss is larger but the time-cost is concentrated, and the per-session commitment is clearer.

Free spins shift the calculus. A reload with 20 free spins at £1 each is, on its own, £20 of slot turnover with the wagering requirement applied to whatever the spins return. A reload with 50 free spins at £0.20 each is £10 of slot turnover with the same multiplier. The two are not equivalent: the spin stake and the spin count both matter, and the slot’s return-to-player decides what comes back from either.

The honest summary is that there is no single best reload. There is a best reload for a particular player on a particular week, and that is the reload whose size, spin count, and validity window match that player’s bankroll and time horizon. The 10x cap and the £5 stake ceiling are the same across all ten brands in the comparison set, and the licence register does not record the rest.

What a reload specifically does not do

A reload offer does not change the house edge. The slot’s return-to-player percentage is the same whether the player is wagering bonus funds or cash funds, and the 10x cap and the £5 stake ceiling apply to both. A reload does not waive the identity and age verification — both are still required before the first deposit, regardless of how long the player has held the account. A reload does not waive GAMSTOP enrolment; a player who has self-excluded cannot claim a reload, and the self-exclusion period — six months, one year, or five years — cannot be shortened. A reload does not waive the £150 net deposit trigger for a financial vulnerability check, which the Commission runs in a rolling 30-day window using public data.

A reload does not move the player outside the regulatory frame. The same protections that apply to a first deposit apply to a tenth deposit, and the same penalties apply to a breach. The bonus cap is not a softer rule for returning players; it is a uniform ceiling.

Offshore and what a reload at an unlicensed site costs the player

A reload offer at an unlicensed site is not a reload offer under the Commission’s rules. It is not subject to the 10x cap, the £5 stake ceiling, the credit-card ban, the GAMSTOP enrolment, or the financial vulnerability check. The bonus can be any size, with any multiplier, on any game, with any terms — because there is no regulator enforcing a ceiling.

What the player gives up is the protection: no GAMSTOP self-exclusion, no approved alternative dispute resolution route, no Commission complaints channel, no ADR. A player who loses funds on an unlicensed site has no route to recover them, and the operator has no obligation to pay out winnings at all. The Commission can disrupt the site — cease-and-desist notices, search-engine delisting, payment and hosting referrals — but has no power to block it at ISP level, and the player is the one who has to choose not to load it.

The price of an unlicensed reload is the loss of every protection the Commission enforces. For a player who has self-excluded via GAMSTOP, an unlicensed site is the one place where that exclusion does not apply, and the reload bonus is the one promotion with no ceiling on what it can demand. The Commission’s enforcement is aimed at the operator, not the player, which is a feature of the regime but not a protection.

Tax and the side of reload bonuses the player does not see

Players in the UK pay no tax on gambling winnings. The reload bonus that converts to withdrawable cash is, like any other gambling winnings, untaxed in the player’s hands. The operator pays Remote Gaming Duty on its gross gaming yield — the difference between stakes and payouts — and that rate moves with the operator’s tax exposure rather than with the player’s. The duty rate was raised from 21% to 40% from 1 April 2026, which is an operator-side change rather than a player-side one; the reload bonus’s value to the player does not change with it. The practical rule for a player is that winnings from a cleared reload bonus are paid out gross, with no tax withheld, and the operator’s own tax exposure is not a line on the player’s terms page.

What the comparison set looks like one year from now

The Commission continues to list new licence accounts as they are granted, and to remove accounts as they lapse. The 18 September 2026 snapshot of 139 active remote casino operating licence holders will change. New operators will enter the comparison set; some current ones will exit. The 10x wagering cap, the £5 maximum stake, the credit-card ban, and the GAMSTOP enrolment are the rules as they stand; if any of them moves, the comparison set moves with it.

For a player choosing between reload offers in 2026, the relevant facts are: the brand is on the register, the bonus is at 10x or under, the eligible games are within the stake ceiling, and the GAMSTOP enrolment is in place. Everything else is product and promotion, and those change weekly. The register is what lasts; the reload calendar is what cycles.

Frequently asked questions

What is a casino reload bonus and how does it differ from a welcome offer?

A reload bonus is a repeat-deposit offer for existing account holders, structured as a percentage match on a top-up plus a free-spin bundle. A welcome offer is the same shape, but it is a one-time acquisition tool aimed at new sign-ups only, and is usually larger because the operator is buying the customer rather than retaining one. Both are governed by the same Commission rules, both carry the same 10x wagering cap, and both clear through the same turnover mechanism once claimed. The difference is the audience: a welcome offer is for a player who has just signed up; a reload is for one who already has a routine.

How often can I claim a reload bonus at a UK casino?

Reload calendars vary by operator: some run weekly offers on a fixed day, some run daily promotions on a rotating slot, and some tie reloads to a particular game or product vertical. There is no Commission-level limit on the frequency of reload offers, but each individual offer has its own validity window — typically 7, 14, or 30 days — and the wagering requirement must be cleared within that window. A player who claims a reload every week at a brand with a weekly cadence is the typical pattern; a player who claims a reload every day at a brand with a daily cadence is unusual but not barred.

Do crypto-funded reload bonuses work the same way as card deposits?

Crypto-funded deposits clear the same way as debit-card or bank-transfer deposits for the purposes of the wagering requirement: the bonus is credited once the deposit lands, and the turnover multiplier is applied to the bonus amount, not to the funding route. The Commission’s rules do not differentiate between funding routes — the credit-card ban applies to crypto-funded deposits that originated in a credit card, and the rest of the rules apply uniformly. Where a brand offers a crypto-specific reload, the offer’s terms page is where the difference lives, and the 10x cap still applies.

What wagering requirement applies to reload bonuses under current UK rules?

Since 19 December 2025, the Gambling Commission has capped wagering requirements on all casino bonuses at 10x. This applies to reload bonuses as it does to welcome offers, free spin bundles, and loyalty perks. The cap is on the multiplier applied to the bonus amount; the bonus itself can be any size, and the time it takes to clear the turnover depends on the bonus amount and the stake per spin. Mixed-product bonuses — a sports bet that unlocks casino spins, or vice versa — have been banned under the same rules.

Is there a minimum deposit needed to unlock a reload bonus?

Yes, and it is set by the offer, not by the operator’s wider payment policy. Reload offers typically set a minimum deposit of £10, £20, or £50, depending on the percentage match and the target player. The deposit must clear before the bonus funds are credited; a deposit that does not clear is not eligible. The minimum is stated on the offer’s terms page, alongside the percentage match, the spin count, and the validity window, and it is the same minimum whether the deposit comes from a debit card, a bank transfer, or an e-wallet.

Can I withdraw reload bonus winnings straight away?

No. Bonus funds remain non-withdrawable until the wagering requirement has been cleared in full. Until that point, the bonus balance is locked regardless of how long the player has held the account or how much cash they have deposited alongside it. Once the turnover is met, the bonus balance converts to withdrawable cash, and the standard withdrawal route applies — debit card, bank transfer, or the e-wallet used to deposit, subject to the operator’s own processing times. The 10x cap reduces the time it takes to reach that point but does not shorten the rule.